Full bibliography
1.5-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infections
- Hernandez, Nicholas M. (Author)
- Buchanan, Michael W. (Author)
- Seyler, Thorsten M. (Author)
- Wellman, Samuel S. (Author)
- Seidelman, Jessica (Author)
- Jiranek, William A. (Author)
Summary:
Key Question: What are the outcomes of using a 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty approach, with an articulating antibiotic spacer intended for prolonged retention, for treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)?
Findings:
- At mean 2.7 years follow-up, 81% of spacers were still in situ.
- 16% underwent later reimplantation at mean 1.5 years.
- 10% had recurrence of PJI requiring reoperation.
- No evidence of component migration was seen, though some radiolucent lines were present.
Clinical Implications:
- 1.5-stage exchange, with an articulating spacer retained for a prolonged period, may be a reasonable approach for treating TKA PJI.
- It had acceptable rates of infection control and component durability in this small case series.
Strengths:
- Novel approach described
- Mean 2.7 years follow-up duration
- Detailed clinical and radiographic outcome reporting
Limitations:
- Small retrospective case series (only 31 knees)
- Lack of comparative group or control
- No patient-reported clinical outcome scores
Level of evidence:
GRADE assessment: Low
Rational: This is a small retrospective case series without controls. There is a lack of high quality comparative data. However, it provides useful preliminary data on this novel approach that can inform future research. The reasonably long mean follow-up and detailed outcomes reporting are strengths, but the small sample size, lack of controls/comparisons, and lack of patient-reported outcomes are limitations that warrant a rating of low quality evidence. This early descriptive data can inform future comparative studies of higher quality.