Orthopedic Infectious Diseases Online Library
Your search
Results 2 resources
-
Background. Patients with hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis (HVO) occasionally require instrumentation for spinal stabilization. However, placing instrumentation in the setting of spinal infection raises concerns about recurrent infection due to bacteria adhering to the foreign material. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic outcomes of patients with HVO who underwent instrumented surgery. Methods. We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with microbiologically diagnosed HVO who underwent surgical intervention in 5 tertiary care hospitals over an 8-year period. Results. A total of 153 patients with HVO underwent surgical management for their infections. Of these 153 patients, 94 (61.4%) underwent surgical debridement alone (noninstrumented surgery) and 59 (38.6%) underwent surgical debridement and instrumentation (instrumented surgery). The median durations of antibiotic therapy were 66 and 80 days for the noninstrumentation and instrumentation groups, respectively (P = .22). Clinical outcomes were similar between the groups, including rates of infection-related death (2.1% vs 0%; P = .52), primary failure (1.1% vs 5.1%; P = .30), and recurrence (4.8% vs 6.8%; P = .72). Among the instrumentation group, there was a significant decreasing trend for recurrence according to total duration of antibiotic therapy: 22.2% (4−6 weeks), 9.1% (6–8 weeks), and 2.6% (≥8 weeks; P = .04). Duration of pre-instrumentation antibiotic therapy and single-stage operation (vs 2-stage operation) were not risk factors for recurrence. Conclusions. Spinal instrumentation in patients with HVO may be safe with pathogen-directed prolonged antibiotic therapy and should not be abandoned or delayed solely because of the risk of recurrence.
-
Spinal implant infection is a rare but significant complication of spinal fusion surgery, and the most common pathogen is Staphylococcus aureus. It is difficult to treat due to this pathogen's biofilm-forming ability and antibiotic resistance. We evaluated the therapeutic outcome of treatments for S aureus spinal implant infections. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with S aureus spinal implant infections at 11 tertiary-care hospitals over a 9-year period. Parameters predictive of treatment failure and recurrence were analyzed by Cox regression. Of the 102 patients with infections, 76 (75%) were caused by methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) and 51 (50%) were late-onset infections. In all, 83 (81%) patients were managed by debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and 19 (19%) had their implants removed. The median duration of all antibiotic therapies was 52 days. During a median follow-up period of 32 months, treatment failure occurred in 37 (36%) cases. The median time to treatment failure was 113 days, being <1 year in 30 (81%) patients. DAIR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 6.27; P = .01) and MRSA infection (aHR, 4.07; P = .009) were independently associated with treatment failure. Rifampin-based combination treatments exhibited independent protective effects on recurrence (aHR, 0.23; P = .02). In conclusion, among patients with S aureus spinal implant infections, MRSA and DAIR were independent risk factors for treatment failure, and these risk factors were present in the majority of patients. In this difficult-to-treat population, the overall treatment failure rate was 36%; rifampin may improve the outcomes of patients with S aureus spinal implant infections.
Explore
Section
Resource type
- Journal Article (2)